
Photo Credit: US Army Corps of Engineers
A question for all you design professionals out there: When was the last time a project you designed was built exactly as shown on your drawings?
The answer, I imagine is “never.”
There’s a myth outside of the construction industry that the architectural team hands over a giant set of blueprints and specifications to the contractor and then a team of construction workers execute those plans with nary a glitch. The misconception is that the construction team “just follows plans” when in fact there is a very entrenched but varying culture on construction sites that determines how workers behave and how projects gets built.
To improve the performance of our buildings, much higher levels of coordination is required between the construction, design and operations teams as well as among the trades working on the project. To build green, it’s critical to get all of these individuals on the same page and change the culture of the job site to include sustainable work practices.
To help the construction industry teach the workforce about sustainability and green work practices, Urban Green Council developed GPRO, a national training program to teach the people who build, renovate and maintain buildings the principles of sustainability combined with trade-specific green construction knowledge.
We’d like to share an excerpt from Trades Going Green in the January 2012 issue of GreenSource magazine. Bruce Buckley features GPRO prominently as he writes about the importance of training and collaboration when building sustainable buildings.
“Changing the culture is an important first step in training trade contractors to think green, says Steve Lehtonen, senior director of environmental education with the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO). “The most important thing to me is the psychology of what we’re doing,” says Lehtonen, who runs IAPMO’s Green Plumbers training program. “We want them to buy into green practices.”
Green Roofs for Healthy Cities (GRHC) launched its Green Roof Professional (GRP) designation program to improve the delivery of green roofs. Jordan Richie, manager of education and accreditation at GRHC, says the program sees a mix of designers and contractors in roofing and landscaping. “We want to stress a collaborative design and installation approach to any green roof,”
Knowledge of green systems and techniques should be a skill set that all contractors have, not one reserved for accredited professionals, says Mike Callanan, executive director of the National Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee (NJATC) of the National Electrical Contractors Association and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.“
The takeaway is that properly trained construction teams who understand green work practices and concepts will build better, higher-performing buildings. As we bring GPRO nationwide, it is our goal to make all buildings be greener as workers become trained in green practices and behavioral norms change.
A couple weeks back I attended “math night” at my kids’ school- when the parents hear about the math curriculum they can expect their children to be following in the coming year. (Bear with me- I promise this is relevant to green building.) The major focus of the evening were changes that will be required by New York State’s adoption of what are called the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for mathematics. The CCSS are a state-led effort to develop best practices guidelines for teaching mathematics across the country. When I first heard that we were about to review the findings of an enormous committee of state bureaucrats I kicked myself for not bringing a book to the meeting. I presumed that we’d be subjected to a nearly illegible mess of obvious and/or irrelevant platitudes- all delivered in bureaucratese, crammed onto Powerpoint slides in chunks of 3-400 words.

Loretta Tapia, GPRO: FUND
Ty Stranger-Thorson, GPRO: CM
Isaiah Matos, GPRO: O&M
Bob Hattier, GPRO: EL
Carl Gambino, GPRO: PL 



Brian Wennersten, LEED BD+C, O+M, GPRO:CM is an Instructor and Principal of SKYed Eco Education & Consulting, and a certified GPRO Instructor. The following is derived from an interview with Anthony Brower, LEED AP BD+C, ID+C, Sustainable Design Director at Gensler.
Greenbuild 2011 in Toronto is complete! The closing plenary on Friday was a pleasant mixture of inspiring presentations, rousing calls to action and jokes about Canadian accents. Fortunately, the Canadians were the ones doing the joking so no international tension was sparked.
The panel this morning walked the audience through recent developments on the C2C front. David Johnson from William McDonough + Partners spoke of small things, such as the release of LEED pilot credit #43 for the use of the Cradle to Cradle framework on building materials, and large, such as their recent projects. These include the Ferrer Grupo building, which is shaped like butterfly wings in plans, and includes an atrium that will release huge quantities of local butterflies seasonally. He talked about Martha Johnson (head of GSA) calling for her agency to base their future on a cradle to cradle framework. Johnson is effectively the landlord of the federal government, so it’s a big deal that she is thinking like this. David Johnson quoted her as saying, “What if disposal wasn’t disposal, what if disposal was pre-design?”
The Canadian benchmarking program is similar to the US EPA Energy Star program. It’s voluntary, for instance, and some of our discussion focused on the impact if NYC’s Greener, Greater Buildings Plan- which mandates benchmarking. On the one hand, voluntary benchmarking has, of course, low participation. But mandatory benchmarking, while creating a much greater data pool, may encourage gaming a system that is, by necessity, a self reporting process. Obviously, because I am familiar with the NYC program I found the Canadian program the most interesting. They have been through a couple rounds of reporting and are starting to see the returns on retrofits. 









